Hi there, people! Essa aula também está no fórum do moodle (http://ead3.uespi.br/moodle/login/index.php)
Watch the video below and, please, post a comment giving your opinion on Krashen's theory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqukbEigUtk&feature=related
In your opinion, is this theoretical construct he presents reliable? Why?
"Acquisition requires meaningful interaction in the target language - natural communication - in which speakers are concerned not with the form of their utterances but with the messages they are conveying and understanding." Stephen Krashen
In my opinion, Stephen Krashen's theory is reliable, because the interaction with the target language is extremely necessary for the language learner can have a domain of language. And so to have this interaction, which has really forget the grammatical form and focus on the baud message so it can be a communication between speaker and listener.
ResponderExcluirMy opinion is that if Stephen Krashen, having thoroughly researched as is supposed, and have formed your opinion categorically, it must coincides reliable from the point of view, the interaction with the target language is one of the factors needed to acquire new language where the learner is replaced by a better grasp language studied. Without losing sight of the focus grammar where the user has basic support for the development of their learning.
ResponderExcluirI agree with Krashen says that as long there is a natural communication, without the whole influence of the grammatical rules governing that language, in which the parts involved can understand the contents of the dialogue, then validates the communicative intention. For the mechanisms present in one language (such as neologisms) regarded as "deviations" does not always affect the meaning and significance of the dialogue that the main focus of linguistics.
ResponderExcluirStephen Krashen's theory is his great contribution to learning a new language, since it states that the learner has to have direct contact with the target language and the acquisition of an L2 should be done in the same way when you're learning the mother tongue, but if that learner is also a student is of fundamental importance that he knows how to use correctly the grammatical rules for a good aesthetic construction of sentences written, which is undoubtedly also a form of communication.
ResponderExcluirI agree with Krashen. Actually the teaching of foreign language can not be focused on the study of linguistic structures. For example, in the mother tongue, first learned to talk and then began to study the normalization grammar. So, what should prioritize language teaching is the communication into the target language.
ResponderExcluir